Wow, nuevamente se abrio el debate de si implementar namespaces en PHP6 o no
entre los core developers...De todas formas en realidad lo que se debate ahora es mas el como? mas que el si/no...
Les pego unas palabras de Sean Cotes, uno de ellos
> The way I see it is that implementing namespaces is a
> technical hurdle, and the reasons we haven't jumped it are
> political, not technical.
>
> So, let's deal with these 3 problems:
>
> Frustration: this thread will likely get long. Please avoid
> long-winded explanation of why you don't like the looks of
> "\" or how ":::" is hard to type. If you have something
> relevant to say, it's probably already been said [2][3].
> Please review the archives.
>
> Indecision: We couldn't decide on "\" or ":::". What this
> comes down to is that "\" is the only remaining operator that
> can be typed in a single keystroke on us_en keyboards. The
> other choice was ":::". I, for one, am OK with either
> operator. I think someone with appropriate (social) karma
> needs to simply commit to one or the other, and we'll make
> do... we always do.
>
> Complacency: Most of the time, I'm happy to maintain the
> status quo in PHP-land. However, the lack of namespaces is
> causing more trouble than its absence is preventing. I think
> most PHP users would agree that namespaces are a welcome
> addition, and without them, PHP suffers. Let's take this in
> small steps and implement optional userspace namespacing.
> There's no need to dive head-first into this and make
> dramatic moves like putting all core functions into a PHP
> namespace. Baby steps, please.
>
> And, in conclusion (thanks for reading this far; I've
> certainly exceeded the average non-code-paste post length, a
> few times over), remember that the core devs discussed this
> in Paris, last year [4]. They didn't come to a conclusion
> (note the use of "if"), though.
Saludos
???.
