data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4afb4/4afb4f9dadf2f619a9d390e7f5740c88d18bc526" alt="Antiguo"
18/02/2002, 02:10
|
| | Fecha de Ingreso: febrero-2002
Mensajes: 73
Antigüedad: 23 años Puntos: 0 | |
Re: comparre un AMD 1.6 es buena idea? Uso procesadores AMD y algunos Intel, y porsupuesto AMD corre mejor aunque recaliente (tiene solucion). Pero si vas ha usar LINUX como plataforma, es mejor no fijarte solo en el micro sino tambien en los demas componentes. Ahi tienes unas notas de RedHat:
" Red Hat Linux will install a kernel optimized for Athlon processors on systems
with an Athlon-class CPU. Due to the optimization, this will put a greater load
on the system components. Therefore, a very small number of machines may
fail to boot as a result of the hardware not strictly conforming with AMDs
specifications and thus being unable to cope with the load. On such systems,
you can either upgrade the hardware (under-powered power supply units can
cause this) or use the rescue capability of the installer to install an i686 kernel.
" Some Athlon-class machines are out-of-spec or have overly aggressive
chipset configurations set by their BIOS. On these systems, you may see
random "Oops" messages at boot time (after successfully completing the
install process) and will be unable to boot successfully. On these systems, boot
with the noathlon option to turn off the athlon optimizations; install the 686
kernel instead of the athlon kernel to avoid this for the future. |